Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for July, 2013

Quote of the day

Renaissance Exercise‘s Ken Hutchins (founder of SuperSlow) writes that it’s important to “understand the difference between exercise and recreation.” His advice:

Do not try to make exercise enjoyable. Do not try to make recreation exercise. If you confuse and mix exercise and recreation, you grossly compromise any forthcoming physical benefits of the exercise; you destroy a large degree of the fun that recreation should bestow; and you make both more dangerous than they need be. Accept both for what they are. If you can place exercise and recreation in their proper perspective, the quality of your life will markedly improve.

From a weight loss/maintenance perspective, I think exercise is critical … but NOT primarily as way of burning calories.

HT Steve Parker.

Read Full Post »

I’m always looking for new blogs, especially as some of my regular reads are either going commercial or are going quiet because they are going commercial. So I’m happy to come across Go Maleo, a blog “written by a dude in the direct style of a dude.” The writer is also a physician who now thinks “about my health and the health of my patients in a new way in part because of the message of body acceptance and eliminating food vilification over at gokaleo.com.”

The first few posts are great reads … I hope he keeps it up! Be sure and check it out.

Read Full Post »

Quote of the day

Writer s.e. smith on a culture of food hatred:

Food is sinful, it’s evil, it’s a temptation, and you must resist it. That’s encoded in the language people use to talk about food today, as something they need to defeat rather than something neutral, with the assignation of ‘good’ and ‘bad’ foods based on the latest fads about dieting and fat. The United States has targeted fat as an enemy and food as its troops, and this attitude is so pervasive that many people experience pressure to hate food and to develop a very harmful relationship with it.

She raises the concern re women being largely “burdened with the responsibility of producing food for their households” and suggests addressing food issues is not an easy fix:

I don’t know how to fix the broken relationship to food in the US. It’s a complicated issue that’s clearly going to require generations to fix, and many of the people currently working on it aren’t thinking broadly enough. Foodies claim to be reasserting our roots and taking food back, but they ignore how food interacts with marginalised populations, for example.

So add s.e.’s voice to others recently concerned about our potentially whacked relationship with food. Pardon the pun, but definitely food for thought.

HT the Fat Nutritionist.

Read Full Post »

Ragen Chastain writes a letter. Here’s a tiny bit:

Dear Fat Kid,

I hope that you are surrounded by people who understand that you and your fat body are amazing. If you’re not, then my first thought is to tell you that your body is amazing and that bullies are just people who are insecure or desperate to feel important. …

Suggesting that fat people should lose weight to avoid this treatment is totally and completely wrong on every level – the problem is not fat people, the problem is people who stigmatize fat people, and the solution to social stigma is ending social stigma, not weight loss. You deserve to be treated with basic human respect.

I know that not everyone is fully on board with fat acceptance (me, I’m sympathetic), but I think it’s well worth considering that stigma and/or shame are probably not helpful and may well be harmful.

Speaking of which, I recently came across a very interesting (and HAES-friendly) paper — Shame, Blame, and the Emerging Law of Obesity Control. Author and American University law prof Lindsay Wiley makes for a compelling case (IMO) why the shame-based strategies of public health’s anti-smoking efforts are perhaps not the best model for efforts to address obesity.

More on this soon!

Read Full Post »

The folks at the Institute for the Psychology of Eating are putting on a virtual conference August 5-9.

I’m sure you’re familiar with the drill on these things … the host typically does a lot of Skype or telephone calls with a bunch of speakers and then makes them available for free for a limited time in exchange for your email address. The goal is to convince you to pay for the recordings and transcripts, with a cut going to whoever linked you to the event (typically a speaker).

I am not speaking at this event, nor am I getting a cut if you wind up paying for the package they are pushing. That said, I am a fan of the eating psychology concept, and I think that there are some interesting folks on the lineup, so I wanted to let you know about it.

But please don’t feel pressured to buy ;).

Read Full Post »

Annoyed woman Orexigen, maker of the potential obesity drug Contrave (a combo of naltrexone and bupropion) has recently published the results of their phase III trial (PDF).

This is the trial that was requested by the FDA in early 2011 after the phase II study was completed. The goal of the new trial was to “demonstrate that the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in overweight and obese subjects treated with naltrexone/bupropion does not adversely affect the drug’s benefit-risk profile.”

Yes, it’s kinda important that an obesity drug not have adverse affects … remember fen-phen? It was relatively popular until the reports of potentially fatal “pulmonary hypertension and heart-valve abnormalities” started showing up.

It’s been more than a decade since the media and researchers wrote about fen-phen with the headline “dying to be thin” so it’s understandable that this time the FDA is being uber-careful about the next generation of obesity drug.

So what does the new study tell us?

(more…)

Read Full Post »

Social policy researcher Helen Lee thinks food activism is leading public health astray (emphasis mine):

Much of the American public health and medical establishment came to believe that one of the most powerful ways to overcome the [obesity] epidemic was to radically remake our school and neighborhood food environments­­, reducing­­ access to unhealthy foods and increasing access to healthy ones.

But in their rush to condemn corporate agribusiness, food marketers, and neighborhood food environments, public health advocates have too often allowed their policy and ideological preferences to race ahead of the science. This has fostered a reductive story about obesity that appeals to liberal audiences but doesn’t comport particularly well with much of what we know about why people choose to eat unhealthy foods, what the health consequences of being overweight or obese actually are, or why health outcomes associated with obesity are so much worse among some populations than others.

Against the current popular discourse, obesity is better understood as an unintended consequence of affluence than as a disease epidemic.

It’s a long read and I had a couple of knee-jerk responses in places, but I think it’s well worth a thoughtful read. In particular, I find one of her conclusions intriguing:

The focus on food environments also led school-based efforts themselves to be too limited. “If the framing of the public remains around individual willpower,” Wallack and Dorfman wrote in their analysis for the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation in 2004, “approaches that seek to improve environments are less likely to be understood by the public.” But if environments, as measured by food deserts and fast food proliferation, have little or no impact on obesity rates, and are unlikely to be expunged of unhealthy foods, the public health focus should rightly consider ways of empowering children to exercise more willpower.

… As such, nutrition education and school gardening programs are probably a lot less valuable than curriculums that show young people how to manage desires for unhealthy foods.

HT Linda Bacon.

Update, 7/16: Interesting timing re Lee’s comment above re affluence … here’s Yoni Freedhoff’s summary of a recently published study looking at body composition among Vanuatu inhabitants:

Risk of obesity, increased body fat percentage, increase waist circumferences and waist to hip ratios all went up in lock step with degree of economic development.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 258 other followers