Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for November, 2011

Quote of the day

Stephan Guyenet responds to Gary Taubes’ criticism that post-WW2 obesity researchers have been studying the wrong things because they are stuck in the wrong paradigm:

Someone should tell Gary Taubes about leptin. And after that, tell him about melanocortins, neuropeptide Y, dopamine, opioids, amylin, ghrelin and all the other factors that researchers have determined regulate body fat accumulation since WWII. Then, all of the brain regions that respond to these factors and have well-defined roles in body fat regulation (e.g., the arcuate nucleus, ventromedial hypothalamus, lateral hypothalamus, paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus). Just because these mechanisms involve the brain doesn’t mean we get to pretend they don’t exist, and then complain that no one is studying the question.

It’s all about the brain baby!

Read Full Post »

One down, one to go

Thank you Martin Berkhan! I have tested your Cheat Day Strategies For A Hedonist during two vacations, one conference, and Thanksgiving, and I am giving it two big thumbs up!

My Thanksgiving indulgences included two small glasses of wine, some homemade cranberry sauce (my mom’s recipe), a tiny slice of apple pie, and a date bar. The rest of the plate was pretty paleo: turkey, broccoli, carrots, and some salad for which I had brought my own apple cider vinaigrette.

Yesterday I was right back on track with my regular way of eating, and gosh, today I just feel fab! I felt pretty darn good yesterday too actually. Did I do a little damage as far as my weight loss goes? Perhaps … won’t know for a while as I’ve only been weighing myself at the doc’s. But in the spirit of Yoni Freedhoff’s philosophy of “living the healthiest life that you can enjoy, not the healthiest life that you can tolerate” I am really pleased with this balance AND that I’ve figured out a way to indulge that doesn’t derail me for weeks or months.

Christmas here I come!

(more…)

Read Full Post »

Ah, the day after Thanksgiving … if you’re in the US, hope this isn’t you ;).

Read Full Post »

Quote of the day

Mass diseases have mass causes.

~ Ancel Keys (via Michael J. Klag)

I’d quibble on whether or not obesity is a “disease” or not, but I thought this a timely quote given my recent comment over at Taubes’ blog!

Read Full Post »

I’d like to blame my cats (above) for the lack of posts recently, but it’s mostly a result of my recent obsession with acquiring badges on PaleoHacks. Now that I have all the easy ones, I will return to more regularly scheduled posts ;).

Read Full Post »

Why we’re effed

Via Jimmy Moore, I see that Dr. Mercola doubled down with Ron Rosedale on the safe starches debate. It’s a debate, so sure, folks will take sides, no biggie. As a fan of the PHD, I’m on Paul Jaminet’s side of course.

But this is what caused my head to explode this morning … after a very lengthy and reasoned discussion, Dr. Mercola summed up his position re starches this way:

Raising blood glucose raises insulin, which increases insulin and leptin resistance.

No, no, no, no, no!!!!!

For any relatively healthy individual, it is most definitely NOT raising blood glucose and insulin via dietary starches per se. If it was, then 100% of Americans would be insulin and leptin resistant, and that is clearly not the case.

So what actually does cause insulin and leptin resistance is still some matter of speculation and more research needs to be done. I’m just a blogger (what do I know?), but I suspect that it is related to overloading your body with too many SAD foods (and their toxins) along with too few essential micronutrients. Essentially the system can only handle the overload to a point, and then things start to break down.

Why this happens to some and not to others is the interesting question to me. Perhaps insulin/leptin resistance kicks in at a certain level of overload (a la Gladwell’s chippers and smoking). Or maybe it's a matter of epigenetics … some of us may be predisposed to react to the SAD environment by packing on the pounds courtesy of what our parents ate before we were even conceived or what our mothers ate while we were in the womb.

Metabolic “derangement”

Of course, the LCers are saying, well, what if you’re not relatively healthy? Well, I’m definitely a met syn girl, and I think removing starches only addresses the symptoms, not the problems. Call me crazy, but I believe there’s a place for starches in my diet — as long as other things like nutrients and the right types of exercise are part of the program. And so far I seem to be doing just fine thank you.

To me, the idea of eliminating starches (safe or otherwise) is on a par with prophylactic mastectomy (removing your breasts to reduce your risk of breast cancer). Perhaps the right choice for some, but hardly something I’d recommend to the general population!

Anyways, the title of the post is a bit extreme, but it is incredibly discouraging to me that this is where we are in terms of understanding obesity. It’s really a tough time to be overweight, and I’m afraid it’s going to get worse.

Read Full Post »

Quote of the day

I recommend that you use [paleo/primal] as your default diet…meaning most of the time. We all “go off” here and there, but it works better if deviation is rare. That’s because I remain impressed with the ability of grains, starches and sugars to take over in the brain (or gut). Those who regain their weight have almost always been co-opted by these kind of carbs.

~ Dr Barbara Berkeley, Refuse to Regain

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 258 other followers