Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for September, 2008

Palin said what?

So here’s a little snippet from Couric/Palin (emphasis mine):

Katie Couric: You made a funny comment, you’ve said you have been listening to Joe Biden’s speeches since you were in second grade.

Gov. Palin: It’s been since like ’72, yah.

Katie Couric: You have a 72-year-old running mate, is that kind of a risky thing to say, insinuating that Joe Biden’s been around awhile?

Gov. Palin: Oh no, it’s nothing negative at all. He’s got a lot of experience and just stating the fact there, that we’ve been hearing his speeches for all these years. So he’s got a tremendous amount of experience and, you know, I’m the new energy, the new face, the new ideas and he’s got the experience based on many many years in the Senate and voters are gonna have a choice there of what it is that they want in these next four years.

Right. Like the new energy, the new face, and the new ideas of Obama versus the experience based on many years of her running mate.

Read Full Post »

Donate to Obama

If you’re following me on Twitter, Facebook, or here on my blog, you know that I’m just a tad partisan as far as this election goes. I realize that not everyone shares my feeling that McCain 2008 bears little resemblance to the John McCain I used to respect or that the prospect of Sarah Palin being a heartbeat away from the presidency — with the nuke codes — has me imagining the Martin Sheen character in the movie The Dead Zone.

So maybe you’re not as on the ledge like me, but if you are at all hoping that this year, the Dems take back the White House, I hope you’ll make a donation to Barack Obama before Wednesday, October 1st.

There’s two really good reasons for this. First, $$. It’s obscene how much TV ads cost, but they do. And although the electoral college map is looking pretty good, there’s still some work to be done in states that are critical. And that means money for ads.

The other good reason is media. If Obama can raise a boatload of dough in September and/or report that they’ve received contributions from hundreds of thousands of new donors, it will add to the momentum that has been building since the Palin buzz subsided. And that momentum is important for helping to sway still undecided voters.

But the timing is key. Donations are reported on a monthly and quarterly basis, hence the importance of the 30th. It won’t hurt to give Obama money in October, but it’d be much better to give it to the campaign in September. And for the reasons above, even small donations are very worthwhile, particularly if you haven’t donated before.

Me, I’m in big time … despite the tanking that my retirement funds are taking right now. Because if there was ever a time when it was important for us support a candidate for change, now is it. Please consider giving even just a little!

Thanks! My return to snark will begin shortly.

Read Full Post »

The Perils of Palin

Ta-Nehisi Coates has a long and thoughtful post on Sarah Palin (hat tip Andrew Sullivan). She starts by saying:

I’ve been thinking a lot about this nomination and rewatching the videos of Palin’s interview. Honestly, it’s all made me tremendously sad. There are lot of us lefties who are guffawing right now and are happy to see Palin seemingly stumbling drunkenly from occasional interview to occasional interview. I may have been one of them. But I’m out of that group now.

I’m afraid I’m still in that group. But only because the alternative is, to me, truly frightening. Palin could well be a heartbeat away from the presidency in four short months. So what may appear as guffawing really has an element of desperation underneath. We need to find if the biggest issues with Sarah Palin are her (to me objectionable) policies on women’s rights and the environment (among others) or whether she has been put in the position of being a real life King Ralph.

Coates also writes (emphasis mine):

My point is that, Sarah Palin never struck me as stupid. When she talked about not backpacking across Europe and working her whole life, beneath the dumb anti-intellectual dig, I saw a gem of truth. I wish she had have mined it, instead of trying to score a cheap point. Rambling aside, she simply isn’t ready. Maybe she would be eight years from now, but she isn’t ready now, any campaign worth its salt would have known this.

In election season, there is a price for being turned into a symbol. When actual journalists, with a rep to protect, show up, they are going to do their job. Which brings me to the sexism of John McCain. He knew full well what Sarah Palin was going to face if he nominated her. He knew that reporters would go through her past, that they’d quizz her on the present, that she would need to be ready, and he shunted concern aside, and tossed her to the wolves. Think on that for a mement. For one last run at the White House, he risked a future star of the party he claims to call home. How do you do that? I don’t meant to rob Palin of agency, certainly she is also a victim of her own calculations and ambitions. But where I am from the elders protect you, and pull you back when you’ve gone too far, when your head has gotten too big.

I agree. I think Sarah Palin is smart, and I bet she is a quick study. But I remember what Paul Sagan, an editor of Time, said about info overload:

No one wants to sit at the bottom of Niagara Falls with a bucket, saying “I can’t keep up with all this.”

Palin is at the bottom of the falls with an eye dropper. And there’s more at risk than the election on November 4th … I twittered this AM that the conservative editor of the National Review noted that Palin’s lack of preparation for the national stage “risks damaging her political brand forevermore.”

That could be a hefty price to pay for a Hail Mary pass.

Update. Fareed Zakaria agrees:

Can we now admit the obvious? Sarah Palin is utterly unqualified to be vice president. She is a feisty, charismatic politician who has done some good things in Alaska. But she has never spent a day thinking about any important national or international issue, and this is a hell of a time to start.

Conservative David Brooks said essentially the same thing on Chris Matthews’ show today. But Zakaria goes it one more:

In these times, for John McCain to have chosen this person to be his running mate is fundamentally irresponsible. McCain says that he always puts country first. In this important case, it is simply not true.

Of course, she’s still drawing in the crowds at her appearances, so all this may actually not matter. Perish the thought.

Read Full Post »

Friday cat blogging

Ok, not my cats, but it made me laugh!

Read Full Post »

Sarah Palin: post turtle?

So I got an email today with the post turtle story applied to Sarah Palin. This was after I read Ruth Marcus’ WaPo column today, which was likewise, not particularly flattering:

An Alaska friend tells me that Palin has always benefited from being underestimated. Maybe I’m doing that. Maybe I’ve been around polished politicians too long to appreciate the unvarnished authenticity that obviously appeals to many voters. But there’s no Palin interview I’ve listened to, before or after her selection, that gave me the sense that she had anything but a millimeter-thin understanding of the issues facing the country she hopes to help lead.

But the highlight was this video in Lawrence Lessig’s famous presentation style:

Well worth the 12 minutes to watch. But if you don’t have the time, just fast-forward through 225 plus years of US VP history to about the 7 minute mark.

Read Full Post »

But he does know how to turn a phrase re McCain 2008:

Under the pressure of the financial crisis, one presidential candidate is behaving like a flustered rookie playing in a league too high. It is not Barack Obama. …

It is arguable that, because of his inexperience, Obama is not ready for the presidency. It is arguable that McCain, because of his boiling moralism and bottomless reservoir of certitudes, is not suited to the presidency. Unreadiness can be corrected, although perhaps at great cost, by experience. Can a dismaying temperament be fixed?

Ouch!

Read Full Post »

Missed this park



Missed this park, originally uploaded by idblog.

I used to stop by this park in north Old Town a lot, but haven’t been
in a while. Picked a great day for a return visit!

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 258 other followers