This one went into the queue when I was doing my renewal, but better late than never. I ran across this post from Presentation Zen which is largely about the Tufte vs Powerpoint smackdown.
Re PPT, the highlights for me are those which counter Tufte’s position: Don Norman’s “In defense of Powerpoint” and Jean-luc Doumont’s The cognitive style of PowerPoint: slides are not all evil.
Enough said about Don (though you should also check out his take on Google’s simplicity). I know Jean-luc from STC, and had the great privilege of being able to review his essay before it was published in their quarterly journal. If you are at all interested in this subject, then either pay the $6 to download it from Amazon, or go find a college library that has back issues of Technical Communication, and find v52(1), p.64 (Feb 2005).
Presentation Zen also recommended Seth Godin’s Gel 2006 talk, specifically because he talks about Tufte and Minard’s graphic of Napoleon’s march to Moscow, which I first saw back in the 1980s in an ACM magazine (I actually framed that magazine page, and still have it in my office nearly 20 years later…that’s one cool graphic).
Godin makes the point that Minard’s graphic is, in essence, “broken on purpose.” He first says that “I think it’s one of the worst graphs ever made” but that this graph is really for the kind of person who gets satisfaction out of getting the complexity in the graph. Or as Godin says, break it for the people you don’t care about, and make it work for the people you do.
But I also recommend the Godin video for its main subject which is why things are broken, which include:
- not my job
- selfish jerks
- the world changed
- I didn’t know
- I’m not a fish
- contradictions
- broken on purpose
Since I’ve watched it, I keep coming back to one or more of his points and go, yep, that’s it (particularly the first and fifth).
Read Full Post »